[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6d9bd1c-9ae6-48ff-88ee-1dfe25eab5d4@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:28:16 +1100
From: Balbir Singh <balbirs@...dia.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: AneeshKumar.KizhakeVeetil@....com, Hasan.Maruf@....com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, Michael.Day@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, david@...hat.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
gourry@...rry.net, hannes@...xchg.org, honggyu.kim@...com, hughd@...gle.com,
jhubbard@...dia.com, k.shutemov@...il.com, kbusch@...a.com,
kmanaouil.dev@...il.com, leesuyeon0506@...il.com, leillc@...gle.com,
liam.howlett@...cle.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, mingo@...hat.com,
nadav.amit@...il.com, nphamcs@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org,
raghavendra.kt@....com, riel@...riel.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
rppt@...nel.org, shivankg@....com, shy828301@...il.com, sj@...nel.org,
vbabka@...e.cz, weixugc@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org,
ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com, ziy@...dia.com, dave@...olabs.net,
yuanchu@...gle.com, hyeonggon.yoo@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Kernel daemon for detecting and promoting hot
pages
On 3/6/25 16:45, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is an attempt towards having a single subsystem that accumulates
> hot page information from lower memory tiers and does hot page
> promotion.
>
> At the heart of this subsystem is a kernel daemon named kpromoted that
> does the following:
>
> 1. Exposes an API that other subsystems which detect/generate memory
> access information can use to inform the daemon about memory
> accesses from lower memory tiers.
> 2. Maintains the list of hot pages and attempts to promote them to
> toptiers.
>
> Currently I have added AMD IBS driver as one source that provides
> page access information as an example. This driver feeds info to
> kpromoted in this RFC patchset. More sources were discussed in a
> similar context here at [1].
>
Is hot page promotion mandated or good to have? Memory tiers today
are a function of latency and bandwidth, specifically in
mt_aperf_to_distance()
adist ~ k * R(B)/R(L) where R(x) is relatively performance of the
memory w.r.t DRAM. Do we want hot pages in the top tier all the time?
Are we optimizing for bandwidth or latency?
> This is just an early attempt to check what it takes to maintain
> a single source of page hotness info and also separate hot page
> detection mechanisms from the promotion mechanism. There are too
> many open ends right now and I have listed a few of them below.
>
<snip>
> This is just an early RFC posted now to ignite some discussion
> in the context of LSFMM [2].
>
I look forward to any summary of the discussions
Balbir Singh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists