[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250318085007.26887-1-cgoettsche@seltendoof.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:50:05 +0100
From: Christian Göttsche <cgoettsche@...tendoof.de>
To:
Cc: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@...glemail.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>,
selinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 7/7] selinux: drop copy-paste comment
From: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@...glemail.com>
Port labeling is based on port number and protocol (TCP/UDP/...) but not
based on network family (IPv4/IPv6).
Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@...glemail.com>
---
security/selinux/netport.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/netport.c b/security/selinux/netport.c
index 2a315dcc4344..cfa55d703ce1 100644
--- a/security/selinux/netport.c
+++ b/security/selinux/netport.c
@@ -47,12 +47,6 @@ struct sel_netport {
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
-/* NOTE: we are using a combined hash table for both IPv4 and IPv6, the reason
- * for this is that I suspect most users will not make heavy use of both
- * address families at the same time so one table will usually end up wasted,
- * if this becomes a problem we can always add a hash table for each address
- * family later */
-
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sel_netport_lock);
static struct sel_netport_bkt sel_netport_hash[SEL_NETPORT_HASH_SIZE];
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists