linux-kernel - Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix missing discard for active segments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <174226143398.3976340.10979169569040925806.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 01:30:33 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+f2fs@...nel.org
To: Chunhai Guo <guochunhai@...o.com>
Cc: chao@...nel.org, jaegeuk@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix missing discard for active segments

Hello:

This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>:

On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:16:24 -0600 you wrote:
> During a checkpoint, the current active segment X may not be handled
> properly. This occurs when segment X has 0 valid blocks and a non-zero
> number of discard blocks, for the following reasons:
> 
> locate_dirty_segment() does not mark any active segment as a prefree
> segment. As a result, segment X is not included in dirty_segmap[PRE], and
> f2fs_clear_prefree_segments() skips it when handling prefree segments.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [f2fs-dev,v3] f2fs: fix missing discard for active segments
    https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/21263d035ff2

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html