[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5880f34b-0fc7-451a-ba2d-8a5d5c7900e5@tuxedocomputers.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:21:23 +0100
From: Werner Sembach <wse@...edocomputers.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Input: atkbd - Correctly map F13 - F24
Hi,
Am 17.03.25 um 23:23 schrieb Hans de Goede:
> Hi Werner,
>
> On 17-Mar-25 6:00 PM, Werner Sembach wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 17.03.25 um 12:58 schrieb Hans de Goede:
>>> Hi Werner,
>>>
>>> On 11-Mar-25 19:06, Werner Sembach wrote:
>>>> Currently only F23 is correctly mapped for PS/2 keyboards.
>>>>
>>>> Following to this table:
>>>> https://download.microsoft.com/download/1/6/1/161ba512-40e2-4cc9-843a-923143f3456c/translate.pdf
>>> That is a very interesting document, good find!
>>>
>>>> - F24 and Zenkaku/Hankaku share the same scancode, but since in real world
>>>> Zenkaku/Hankaku keys seem to just use the tilde scancode, this patch binds the
>>>> scancode to F24. Note that on userspace side the KEY_ZENKAKUHANKAKU keycode is
>>>> currently not bound in xkeyboard-config, so it is (mostly*) unused anyway.
>>>>
>>>> * Qt on Wayland and therefore KDE on Wayland can see the keypress anyway for
>>>> some reason and it is actually used in a touchpad toggle shortcut, but this is
>>>> currently being fixed in both KDE and xkeyboard-config to make this less weird,
>>>> so it could directly be fixed to correctly handle the F24 keypress instead.
>>>>
>>>> - The scancodes for F13-F22 are currently unmapped so there will probably be no
>>>> harm in mapping them. This would also fix the issue that some of these keys
>>>> can't be mapped as the target from userspace using the `setkeycodes` command.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Werner Sembach <wse@...edocomputers.com>
>>> Thanks, patch looks good to me:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>> Thanks for reviewing.
>>
>> Should I resend the patch standalone because the first of this Patchset will likely be rejected?
> I think this one will apply cleanly without applying patch 1/2
> first, so no reason for a resend / v3 AFAICT.
>
> Let's wait and see what feedback Dmitry have once he can make
> some time to take a look at this.
Ack
Best regards,
Werner
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c | 12 ++++++------
>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c
>>>> index 3598a21d9d014..4bd6e6ef0715e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c
>>>> @@ -84,12 +84,12 @@ static const unsigned short atkbd_set2_keycode[ATKBD_KEYMAP_SIZE] = {
>>>> #include "hpps2atkbd.h" /* include the keyboard scancodes */
>>>> #else
>>>> - 0, 67, 65, 63, 61, 59, 60, 88, 0, 68, 66, 64, 62, 15, 41,117,
>>>> - 0, 56, 42, 93, 29, 16, 2, 0, 0, 0, 44, 31, 30, 17, 3, 0,
>>>> - 0, 46, 45, 32, 18, 5, 4, 95, 0, 57, 47, 33, 20, 19, 6,183,
>>>> - 0, 49, 48, 35, 34, 21, 7,184, 0, 0, 50, 36, 22, 8, 9,185,
>>>> - 0, 51, 37, 23, 24, 11, 10, 0, 0, 52, 53, 38, 39, 25, 12, 0,
>>>> - 0, 89, 40, 0, 26, 13, 0,193, 58, 54, 28, 27, 0, 43, 0, 85,
>>>> + 0, 67, 65, 63, 61, 59, 60, 88,183, 68, 66, 64, 62, 15, 41,117,
>>>> + 184, 56, 42, 93, 29, 16, 2, 0,185, 0, 44, 31, 30, 17, 3, 0,
>>>> + 186, 46, 45, 32, 18, 5, 4, 95,187, 57, 47, 33, 20, 19, 6,183,
>>>> + 188, 49, 48, 35, 34, 21, 7,184,189, 0, 50, 36, 22, 8, 9,185,
>>>> + 190, 51, 37, 23, 24, 11, 10, 0,191, 52, 53, 38, 39, 25, 12, 0,
>>>> + 192, 89, 40, 0, 26, 13, 0,193, 58, 54, 28, 27, 0, 43, 0,194,
>>>> 0, 86, 91, 90, 92, 0, 14, 94, 0, 79,124, 75, 71,121, 0, 0,
>>>> 82, 83, 80, 76, 77, 72, 1, 69, 87, 78, 81, 74, 55, 73, 70, 99,
>>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists