[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7eee35fe-0d88-4f38-b381-1ea2ee4a4715@stanley.mountain>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:03:36 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, cocci@...ia.fr,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0001: Fix exception handling in
cfi_intelext_setup()
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 08:21:53PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:13:51 +0100
>
> The label “setup_err” was used to jump to another pointer check despite of
> the detail in the implementation of the function “cfi_intelext_setup”
> that it was determined already that a corresponding variable contained
> a null pointer because of a failed memory allocation.
>
> * Thus use more appropriate labels instead.
>
> * Delete a redundant check.
>
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Don't use a Fixes tag for cleanups.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists