lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9rrKd1PoZ0WEaa6@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:04:57 +0000
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <shenghao-ding@...com>, <kevin-lu@...com>,
        <baojun.xu@...com>, <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] ASoC: ops: Factor out common code from get
 callbacks

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:12:56PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 05:14:57PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > There are only two differences between snd_soc_get_volsw() and
> > snd_soc_get_volsw_sx(). The maximum field is handled differently, and
> > snd_soc_get_volsw() supports double controls with both values in the
> > same register.
> 
> This breaks an x86 allmodconfig build:
> 
> /build/stage/linux/sound/soc/soc-ops.c: In function ‘snd_soc_get_volsw_sx’:
> /build/stage/linux/sound/soc/soc-ops.c:374:22: error: unused variable ‘reg2’ [-W
> error=unused-variable]
>   374 |         unsigned int reg2 = mc->rreg;
>       |                      ^~~~
> /build/stage/linux/sound/soc/soc-ops.c:373:22: error: unused variable ‘reg’ [-We
> rror=unused-variable]
>   373 |         unsigned int reg = mc->reg;
>       |                      ^~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Please ensure your serieses are bisectable.

Sorry those do get cleaned up in the next patch but will respin
to move them into this patch, must have got muddled in the rebase
at some point.

Thanks,
Charles

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ