linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add specific APPS RSC compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <rg377etwxv3yupth3acak4ycthahi7sennm54sbah55yqj2qdk@vip4xxkbsp7n>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 19:25:54 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
        Marc Gonzalez <mgonzalez@...ebox.fr>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, Arnaud Vrac <avrac@...ebox.fr>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add specific APPS RSC
 compatible

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:14:42PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 3/18/25 10:30 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 07:35:15PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
> >>
> >> SC7180 comes in a couple firmware flavors, some of which don't support
> >> PSCI in OSI mode. That prevents the power domain exepcted by the RSC
> >> node from providing useful information on system power collapse.
> > 
> > Is this behaviour specific to SC7180 or only to ChromeBooks? For example
> > TCL Book 14 Go or ECS Liva QC710, would they also use this compat?
> 
> The hardware and firmware representation of the RSC is identical, but
> I wanted to alter the bindings required properties based on the specific
> possibly-chrome platforms.

Should we instead have a separate compatible (?) for ChromeOS platforms
only?

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry