lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m4oobdgqvilcwqrtkdlmcttw2peqgtxregrfve2stwwsp3gbr4@3obh3xzy3muk>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 20:51:54 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
        Marc Gonzalez <mgonzalez@...ebox.fr>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, Arnaud Vrac <avrac@...ebox.fr>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add specific APPS RSC
 compatible

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:28:46PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 3/19/25 6:25 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:14:42PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >> On 3/18/25 10:30 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 07:35:15PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >>>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> SC7180 comes in a couple firmware flavors, some of which don't support
> >>>> PSCI in OSI mode. That prevents the power domain exepcted by the RSC
> >>>> node from providing useful information on system power collapse.
> >>>
> >>> Is this behaviour specific to SC7180 or only to ChromeBooks? For example
> >>> TCL Book 14 Go or ECS Liva QC710, would they also use this compat?
> >>
> >> The hardware and firmware representation of the RSC is identical, but
> >> I wanted to alter the bindings required properties based on the specific
> >> possibly-chrome platforms.
> > 
> > Should we instead have a separate compatible (?) for ChromeOS platforms
> > only?
> 
> No, the RSC is exactly the same. Quite frankly, the expected power-domains
> entry is just a way that's convenient to Linux to signal the platform going
> off between the drivers
> 
> I don't think there is much to overthink here.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ