linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] mfd: ocelot: add support for MDIO managed switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z9shJ5_ixKMCGPyy@colin-ia-desktop>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:55:19 -0500
From: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <ravi@...vas.dk>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Felix Blix Everberg <felix.blix@...vas.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] mfd: ocelot: add support for MDIO managed switch

Hi Rasmus,

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 01:30:50PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> While reworking the spi and core files to allow hooking up another
> underlying bus, I found what I think might be a bug in the SPI
> implementation, for the case where the SPI bus is set higher than
> 500kHz. But as I don't have such hardware, I don't know if the bug is
> real, nor am I able to test my changes.
>
> If desired, I can drop those changes

I ran the patch set on my setup and everything worked. I was hopeful
that it would solve a power sequencing issue that I came across a while
back. It didn't, but the logic works and seems sound, so I say keep it!

I'll review my parts and add the relevant testing tags.

Thanks for the update, and I'm glad it is being used!

Colin Foster