[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <avat6oilygpkcngtpuyentyvjqifav4f3zzvrtnsdybfl6uqja@i2surd4ywu73>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:46:53 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>, Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>,
Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] misc: Support TI FPC202 dual-port controller
Hi,
> Romain Gantois (9):
> dt-bindings: misc: Describe TI FPC202 dual port controller
> media: i2c: ds90ub960: Replace aliased clients list with address list
> media: i2c: ds90ub960: Protect alias_use_mask with a mutex
> i2c: use client addresses directly in ATR interface
> i2c: move ATR alias pool to a separate struct
> i2c: rename field 'alias_list' of struct i2c_atr_chan to 'alias_pairs'
> i2c: support per-channel ATR alias pools
> i2c: Support dynamic address translation
> misc: add FPC202 dual port controller driver
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/misc/ti,fpc202.yaml | 94 ++++
> MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> drivers/i2c/i2c-atr.c | 483 ++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub913.c | 9 +-
> drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub953.c | 9 +-
> drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c | 49 ++-
> drivers/misc/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/misc/ti_fpc202.c | 438 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/i2c-atr.h | 54 ++-
> 10 files changed, 965 insertions(+), 191 deletions(-)
how are we going to take this? I think we are at the last bits of
reviews and it's time to plan merging this series.
Do we need to wait for media and then take i2c? Or shall wee take
everything via i2c.
I had a look at the whole series and looks quite all right to me.
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists