[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c03fbda6-4465-4ada-a9eb-d02893f509d4@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:57:49 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: marc.herbert@...ux.intel.com
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: move hugetlb_sysctl_init() to the __init
section
On 3/19/25 11:30, marc.herbert@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Marc Herbert <Marc.Herbert@...ux.intel.com>
>
> hugetlb_sysctl_init() is only invoked once by an __init function and is
> merely a wrapper around another __init function so there is not reason
> to keep it.
>
> Fixes the following warning when toning down some GCC inline options:
>
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference:
> hugetlb_sysctl_init+0x1b (section: .text) ->
> __register_sysctl_init (section: .init.text)
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Herbert <Marc.Herbert@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 65068671e460..a2850b26aed9 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4900,7 +4900,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table hugetlb_table[] = {
> },
> };
>
> -static void hugetlb_sysctl_init(void)
> +static void __init hugetlb_sysctl_init(void)
> {
> register_sysctl_init("vm", hugetlb_table);
> }
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists