linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] dt-bindings: clock: axg-audio: Add mclk and sclk pad clock ids

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250319-daffy-classy-kangaroo-023e1f@krzk-bin>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:22:13 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: jiebing chen <jiebing.chen@...ogic.com>
Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, 
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, 
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, jian.xu@...ogic.com, 
	shuai.li@...ogic.com, zhe.wang@...ogic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] dt-bindings: clock: axg-audio: Add mclk and sclk
 pad clock ids

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:04:45PM +0800, jiebing chen wrote:
> Add clock IDs for the mclk pads found on s4 SoCs
> 
> Signed-off-by: jiebing chen <jiebing.chen@...ogic.com>
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/axg-audio-clkc.h | 11 +++++++++++

This belongs to the binding patch, usually.

Anyway - do not ask us to do the work twice.

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof