[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250319092951.37667-27-jirislaby@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:29:19 +0100
From: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: maz@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 26/57] irqdomain: misc: Switch to irq_domain_create_simple()
irq_domain_add_simple() is going away as being obsolete now. Switch to
the preferred irq_domain_create_simple(). That differs in the first
parameter: It takes more generic struct fwnode_handle instead of struct
device_node. Therefore, of_fwnode_handle() is added around the
parameter.
Note some of the users can likely use dev->fwnode directly instead of
indirect of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node). But dev->fwnode is not
guaranteed to be set for all, so this has to be investigated on case to
case basis (by people who can actually test with the HW).
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/misc/hi6421v600-irq.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/hi6421v600-irq.c b/drivers/misc/hi6421v600-irq.c
index 69ee4f39af2a..187c5bc91e31 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/hi6421v600-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/hi6421v600-irq.c
@@ -254,8 +254,9 @@ static int hi6421v600_irq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!priv->irqs)
return -ENOMEM;
- priv->domain = irq_domain_add_simple(np, PMIC_IRQ_LIST_MAX, 0,
- &hi6421v600_domain_ops, priv);
+ priv->domain = irq_domain_create_simple(of_fwnode_handle(np),
+ PMIC_IRQ_LIST_MAX, 0,
+ &hi6421v600_domain_ops, priv);
if (!priv->domain) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to create IRQ domain\n");
return -ENODEV;
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists