[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250320185238.447458-22-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 12:51:59 -0600
From: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx-trybot@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: jbaron@...mai.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
ukaszb@...omium.org,
louis.chauvet@...tlin.com,
daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com,
jani.nikula@...el.com,
ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com,
Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 21/59] dyndbg-test: change do_prints testpoint to accept a loopct
echo 1000 > /sys/module/test_dynamic_debug/parameters/do_prints
This allows its use as a scriptable load generator, to generate
dynamic-prefix-emits for flag combinations vs undecorated messages.
This will make it easy to assess the cost of the prefixing.
Reading the ./do_prints node also prints messages (once) to the-log.
NB: the count is clamped to 10000, chosen to be notice able, but not
annoying, and not enough to accidentally flood the logs.
Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
---
lib/test_dynamic_debug.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_dynamic_debug.c b/lib/test_dynamic_debug.c
index 9f9e3fddd7e6..4a3d2612ef60 100644
--- a/lib/test_dynamic_debug.c
+++ b/lib/test_dynamic_debug.c
@@ -29,18 +29,30 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
-/* re-gen output by reading or writing sysfs node: do_prints */
-
-static void do_prints(void); /* device under test */
+/* re-trigger debug output by reading or writing sysfs node: do_prints */
+#define PRINT_CLAMP 10000
+static void do_prints(unsigned int); /* device under test */
static int param_set_do_prints(const char *instr, const struct kernel_param *kp)
{
- do_prints();
+ int rc;
+ unsigned int ct;
+
+ rc = kstrtouint(instr, 0, &ct);
+ if (rc) {
+ pr_err("expecting numeric input, using 1 instead\n");
+ ct = 1;
+ }
+ if (ct > PRINT_CLAMP) {
+ ct = PRINT_CLAMP;
+ pr_info("clamping print-count to %d\n", ct);
+ }
+ do_prints(ct);
return 0;
}
static int param_get_do_prints(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp)
{
- do_prints();
- return scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "did do_prints\n");
+ do_prints(1);
+ return scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "did 1 do_prints\n");
}
static const struct kernel_param_ops param_ops_do_prints = {
.set = param_set_do_prints,
@@ -191,17 +203,20 @@ static void do_levels(void)
prdbg(V7);
}
-static void do_prints(void)
+static void do_prints(unsigned int ct)
{
- pr_debug("do_prints:\n");
- do_cats();
- do_levels();
+ /* maybe clamp this */
+ pr_debug("do-prints %d times:\n", ct);
+ for (; ct; ct--) {
+ do_cats();
+ do_levels();
+ }
}
static int __init test_dynamic_debug_init(void)
{
pr_debug("init start\n");
- do_prints();
+ do_prints(1);
pr_debug("init done\n");
return 0;
}
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists