lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9xsx-w4YCBuYjx5@eldamar.lan>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:30:15 +0100
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@...linux.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lvc-patches@...uxtesting.org, dutyrok@...linux.org,
	gerben@...linux.org,
	syzbot+5f3a973ed3dfb85a6683@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hfs/hfsplus: fix slab-out-of-bounds in hfs_bnode_read_key

Hi

On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 10:13:03PM +0300, Vasiliy Kovalev wrote:
> Syzbot reported an issue in hfs subsystem:
> 
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in memcpy_from_page include/linux/highmem.h:423 [inline]
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in hfs_bnode_read fs/hfs/bnode.c:35 [inline]
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in hfs_bnode_read_key+0x314/0x450 fs/hfs/bnode.c:70
> Write of size 94 at addr ffff8880123cd100 by task syz-executor237/5102
> 
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
>  dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>  print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]
>  print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488
>  kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601
>  kasan_check_range+0x282/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189
>  __asan_memcpy+0x40/0x70 mm/kasan/shadow.c:106
>  memcpy_from_page include/linux/highmem.h:423 [inline]
>  hfs_bnode_read fs/hfs/bnode.c:35 [inline]
>  hfs_bnode_read_key+0x314/0x450 fs/hfs/bnode.c:70
>  hfs_brec_insert+0x7f3/0xbd0 fs/hfs/brec.c:159
>  hfs_cat_create+0x41d/0xa50 fs/hfs/catalog.c:118
>  hfs_mkdir+0x6c/0xe0 fs/hfs/dir.c:232
>  vfs_mkdir+0x2f9/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:4257
>  do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4280
>  __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4300 [inline]
>  __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4298 [inline]
>  __x64_sys_mkdir+0x6c/0x80 fs/namei.c:4298
>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> RIP: 0033:0x7fbdd6057a99
> 
> Add a check for key length in hfs_bnode_read_key to prevent
> out-of-bounds memory access. If the key length is invalid, the
> key buffer is cleared, improving stability and reliability.
> 
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Reported-by: syzbot+5f3a973ed3dfb85a6683@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5f3a973ed3dfb85a6683
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@...linux.org>
> ---
>  fs/hfs/bnode.c     | 6 ++++++
>  fs/hfsplus/bnode.c | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/hfs/bnode.c b/fs/hfs/bnode.c
> index 6add6ebfef8967..cb823a8a6ba960 100644
> --- a/fs/hfs/bnode.c
> +++ b/fs/hfs/bnode.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ void hfs_bnode_read_key(struct hfs_bnode *node, void *key, int off)
>  	else
>  		key_len = tree->max_key_len + 1;
>  
> +	if (key_len > sizeof(hfs_btree_key) || key_len < 1) {
> +		memset(key, 0, sizeof(hfs_btree_key));
> +		pr_err("hfs: Invalid key length: %d\n", key_len);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	hfs_bnode_read(node, key, off, key_len);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/bnode.c b/fs/hfsplus/bnode.c
> index 87974d5e679156..079ea80534f7de 100644
> --- a/fs/hfsplus/bnode.c
> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/bnode.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ void hfs_bnode_read_key(struct hfs_bnode *node, void *key, int off)
>  	else
>  		key_len = tree->max_key_len + 2;
>  
> +	if (key_len > sizeof(hfsplus_btree_key) || key_len < 1) {
> +		memset(key, 0, sizeof(hfsplus_btree_key));
> +		pr_err("hfsplus: Invalid key length: %d\n", key_len);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	hfs_bnode_read(node, key, off, key_len);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.33.8

I do realize that the HFS filesystem is "Orphan". But in the light of
the disclosure in
https://ssd-disclosure.com/ssd-advisory-linux-kernel-hfsplus-slab-out-of-bounds-write/
is there still something which needs to be done here?

Does the above needs to be picked in mainline and then propagated to
the supported stable versions?

Regards,
Salvatore

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ