[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d55ba3cd-2de5-7520-a0b2-e5bcb6bad235@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:40:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
To: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>
cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Luis Goncalves <lgoncalv@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] rtla/osnoise: Set OSNOISE_WORKLOAD to true
On Thu, 20 Mar 2025, Tomas Glozar wrote:
> If running rtla osnoise with NO_OSNOISE_WORKLOAD, it reports no samples:
>
> $ echo NO_OSNOISE_WORKLOAD > /sys/kernel/tracing/osnoise/options
> $ rtla osnoise hist -d 10s
> Index
> over: 0
> count: 0
> min: 0
> avg: 0
> max: 0
>
> This situation can also happen when running rtla-osnoise after an
> improperly exited rtla-timerlat run.
>
> Set OSNOISE_WORKLOAD in rtla-osnoise, too, similarly to what we
> already did for timerlat in commit 217f0b1e990e ("rtla/timerlat_top: Set
> OSNOISE_WORKLOAD for kernel threads") and commit d8d866171a41
> ("rtla/timerlat_hist: Set OSNOISE_WORKLOAD for kernel threads").
>
> Note that there is no user workload mode for rtla-osnoise yet, so
> OSNOISE_WORKLOAD is always set to true.
>
> Fixes: 1eceb2fc2ca5 ("rtla/osnoise: Add osnoise top mode")
> Fixes: 829a6c0b5698 ("rtla/osnoise: Add the hist mode")
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>
> ---
> tools/tracing/rtla/src/osnoise.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/osnoise.c b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/osnoise.c
> index 1735a36466c4..a71618d876e9 100644
> --- a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/osnoise.c
> +++ b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/osnoise.c
> @@ -1187,6 +1187,12 @@ osnoise_apply_config(struct osnoise_tool *tool, struct osnoise_params *params)
> auto_house_keeping(¶ms->monitored_cpus);
> }
>
> + retval = osnoise_set_workload(tool->context, true);
> + if (retval < -1) {
> + err_msg("Failed to set OSNOISE_WORKLOAD option\n");
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
>
> out_err:
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>
>
Reviewed-by: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists