| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Z9t0h5vvxP+meMkO@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 09:51:03 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: steven chen <chenste@...ux.microsoft.com>, stefanb@...ux.ibm.com,
roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com, roberto.sassu@...wei.com,
eric.snowberg@...cle.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
paul@...l-moore.com, code@...icks.com, bauermann@...abnow.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com, nramas@...ux.microsoft.com,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
dyoung@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/8] ima: define and call ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf()
On 03/19/25 at 12:27pm, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 16:09 +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 03/17/25 at 06:04pm, steven chen wrote:
> > > Carrying the IMA measurement list across kexec requires allocating a
> > > buffer and copying the measurement records. Separate allocating the
> > > buffer and copying the measurement records into separate functions in
> > > order to allocate the buffer at kexec 'load' and copy the measurements
> > > at kexec 'execute'.
> > >
> > > This patch includes the following changes:
> > > - Refactor ima_dump_measurement_list() to move the memory allocation
> > > to a separate function ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf() which allocates
> > > buffer of size 'kexec_segment_size' at kexec 'load'.
> > > - Make the local variable ima_kexec_file in ima_dump_measurement_list()
> > > a local static to the file, so that it can be accessed from
> > > ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf().
> > > - Make necessary changes to the function ima_add_kexec_buffer() to call
> > > the above two functions.
> >
> > We may not need above details about code change because it's not so
> > difficult to get them from patch.
>
> Agreed. The changes don't even reflect the current patch. Please remove the
> entire section.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@...ux.microsoft.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: steven chen <chenste@...ux.microsoft.com>
> > > ---
> > > security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> > > index 8567619889d1..45170e283272 100644
> > > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> > > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> > > @@ -15,6 +15,48 @@
> > > #include "ima.h"
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
> > > +static struct seq_file ima_kexec_file;
> > > +
> > > +static void ima_reset_kexec_file(struct seq_file *sf)
> > > +{
> > > + sf->buf = NULL;
> > > + sf->size = 0;
> > > + sf->read_pos = 0;
> > > + sf->count = 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void ima_free_kexec_file_buf(struct seq_file *sf)
> > > +{
> > > + vfree(sf->buf);
> > > + ima_reset_kexec_file(sf);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf(size_t segment_size)
> > > +{
> > > + /*
> > > + * kexec 'load' may be called multiple times.
> > > + * Free and realloc the buffer only if the segment_size is
> > > + * changed from the previous kexec 'load' call.
> > > + */
> > > + if (ima_kexec_file.buf && ima_kexec_file.size == segment_size)
> > > + goto out;
>
> The call to ima_reset_kexec_file() in ima_add_kexec_buffer() resets
> ima_kexec_file.buf() hiding the fact that the above test always fails and falls
> through. As a result, 'buf' is always being re-allocated.
>
> > > +
> > > + ima_free_kexec_file_buf(&ima_kexec_file);
> > > +
> > > + /* segment size can't change between kexec load and execute */
> > > + ima_kexec_file.buf = vmalloc(segment_size);
> > > + if (!ima_kexec_file.buf)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + ima_kexec_file.size = segment_size;
> > > +
> > > +out:
> > > + ima_kexec_file.read_pos = 0;
> > > + ima_kexec_file.count = sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr); /* reserved space */
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * Copy the measurement list to the allocated memory
> > > * compare the size of IMA measurement list with the size of the allocated memory
> > > @@ -26,23 +68,16 @@
> > > static int ima_dump_measurement_list(unsigned long *buffer_size, void **buffer,
> > > unsigned long segment_size)
> > > {
> > > - struct seq_file ima_kexec_file;
> > > struct ima_queue_entry *qe;
> > > struct ima_kexec_hdr khdr;
> > > int ret = 0;
> > >
> > > /* segment size can't change between kexec load and execute */
> > > - ima_kexec_file.buf = vmalloc(segment_size);
> > > if (!ima_kexec_file.buf) {
> > > - ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > - goto out;
> > > + pr_err("Kexec file buf not allocated\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - ima_kexec_file.file = NULL;
> > > - ima_kexec_file.size = segment_size;
> > > - ima_kexec_file.read_pos = 0;
> > > - ima_kexec_file.count = sizeof(khdr); /* reserved space */
> > > -
> > > memset(&khdr, 0, sizeof(khdr));
> > > khdr.version = 1;
> > > /* This is an append-only list, no need to hold the RCU read lock */
> > > @@ -79,8 +114,6 @@ static int ima_dump_measurement_list(unsigned long *buffer_size, void **buffer,
> > > *buffer_size = ima_kexec_file.count;
> > > *buffer = ima_kexec_file.buf;
> > > out:
> > > - if (ret == -EINVAL)
> > > - vfree(ima_kexec_file.buf);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -119,6 +152,12 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
> > > return;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + ret = ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf(kexec_segment_size);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + pr_err("Not enough memory for the kexec measurement buffer.\n");
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > ima_dump_measurement_list(&kexec_buffer_size, &kexec_buffer,
> > > kexec_segment_size);
> > > if (!kexec_buffer) {
> > > @@ -140,6 +179,12 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
> > > image->ima_buffer_size = kexec_segment_size;
> > > image->ima_buffer = kexec_buffer;
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * kexec owns kexec_buffer after kexec_add_buffer() is called
> > > + * and it will vfree() that buffer.
> > > + */
> > > + ima_reset_kexec_file(&ima_kexec_file);
> >
> > I can't see why we need call ima_reset_kexec_file() here. If we need
> > reuse the buffer, we will reset the needed fields at the end of
> > ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf(). Not sure if I miss anything.
>
> Without ima_reset_kexec_file(), calling 'kexec load' consecutively without
> "kexec -s -e" in between fails.
>
> # kexec -s -l /boot/vmlinuz-`uname -r` --initrd=/boot/initramfs-`uname -r`.img --reuse-cmdline
> # kexec -s -l /boot/vmlinuz-`uname -r` --initrd=/boot/initramfs-`uname -r`.img --reuse-cmdline
> Killed
>
> As mentioned above, the call to ima_reset_kexec_file() resets
> ima_kexec_file.buf, so the segment size test always fails and the memory is
> being allocated.
Indeed, I didn't realize this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists