| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20250320114200.14377-24-jolsa@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 12:41:58 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
Subject: [PATCH RFCv3 23/23] selftests/seccomp: validate uprobe syscall passes through seccomp
Adding uprobe checks into the current uretprobe tests.
All the related tests are now executed with attached uprobe
or uretprobe or without any probe.
Renaming the test fixture to uprobe, because it seems better.
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 107 ++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 14ba51b52095..794787786968 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -73,6 +73,14 @@
#define noinline __attribute__((noinline))
#endif
+#ifndef __nocf_check
+#define __nocf_check __attribute__((nocf_check))
+#endif
+
+#ifndef __naked
+#define __naked __attribute__((__naked__))
+#endif
+
#ifndef PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS
#define PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS 38
#define PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS 39
@@ -4893,7 +4901,36 @@ TEST(tsync_vs_dead_thread_leader)
EXPECT_EQ(0, status);
}
-noinline int probed(void)
+#ifdef __x86_64__
+
+/*
+ * We need naked probed_uprobe function. Using __nocf_check
+ * check to skip possible endbr64 instruction and ignoring
+ * -Wattributes, otherwise the compilation might fail.
+ */
+#pragma GCC diagnostic push
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wattributes"
+
+__naked __nocf_check noinline int probed_uprobe(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * Optimized uprobe is possible only on top of nop5 instruction.
+ */
+ asm volatile (" \n"
+ ".byte 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00 \n"
+ "ret \n"
+ );
+}
+#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
+
+#else
+noinline int probed_uprobe(void)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+#endif
+
+noinline int probed_uretprobe(void)
{
return 1;
}
@@ -4946,35 +4983,46 @@ static ssize_t get_uprobe_offset(const void *addr)
return found ? (uintptr_t)addr - start + base : -1;
}
-FIXTURE(URETPROBE) {
+FIXTURE(UPROBE) {
int fd;
};
-FIXTURE_VARIANT(URETPROBE) {
+FIXTURE_VARIANT(UPROBE) {
/*
- * All of the URETPROBE behaviors can be tested with either
- * uretprobe attached or not
+ * All of the U(RET)PROBE behaviors can be tested with either
+ * u(ret)probe attached or not
*/
bool attach;
+ /*
+ * Test both uprobe and uretprobe.
+ */
+ bool uretprobe;
};
-FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(URETPROBE, attached) {
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(UPROBE, not_attached) {
+ .attach = false,
+ .uretprobe = false,
+};
+
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(UPROBE, uprobe_attached) {
.attach = true,
+ .uretprobe = false,
};
-FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(URETPROBE, not_attached) {
- .attach = false,
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(UPROBE, uretprobe_attached) {
+ .attach = true,
+ .uretprobe = true,
};
-FIXTURE_SETUP(URETPROBE)
+FIXTURE_SETUP(UPROBE)
{
const size_t attr_sz = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr);
struct perf_event_attr attr;
ssize_t offset;
int type, bit;
-#ifndef __NR_uretprobe
- SKIP(return, "__NR_uretprobe syscall not defined");
+#if !defined(__NR_uprobe) || !defined(__NR_uretprobe)
+ SKIP(return, "__NR_uprobe ot __NR_uretprobe syscalls not defined");
#endif
if (!variant->attach)
@@ -4984,12 +5032,17 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(URETPROBE)
type = determine_uprobe_perf_type();
ASSERT_GE(type, 0);
- bit = determine_uprobe_retprobe_bit();
- ASSERT_GE(bit, 0);
- offset = get_uprobe_offset(probed);
+
+ if (variant->uretprobe) {
+ bit = determine_uprobe_retprobe_bit();
+ ASSERT_GE(bit, 0);
+ }
+
+ offset = get_uprobe_offset(variant->uretprobe ? probed_uretprobe : probed_uprobe);
ASSERT_GE(offset, 0);
- attr.config |= 1 << bit;
+ if (variant->uretprobe)
+ attr.config |= 1 << bit;
attr.size = attr_sz;
attr.type = type;
attr.config1 = ptr_to_u64("/proc/self/exe");
@@ -5000,7 +5053,7 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(URETPROBE)
PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
}
-FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(URETPROBE)
+FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(UPROBE)
{
/* we could call close(self->fd), but we'd need extra filter for
* that and since we are calling _exit right away..
@@ -5014,11 +5067,17 @@ static int run_probed_with_filter(struct sock_fprog *prog)
return -1;
}
- probed();
+ /*
+ * Uprobe is optimized after first hit, so let's hit twice.
+ */
+ probed_uprobe();
+ probed_uprobe();
+
+ probed_uretprobe();
return 0;
}
-TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_default_allow)
+TEST_F(UPROBE, uprobe_default_allow)
{
struct sock_filter filter[] = {
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW),
@@ -5031,7 +5090,7 @@ TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_default_allow)
ASSERT_EQ(0, run_probed_with_filter(&prog));
}
-TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_default_block)
+TEST_F(UPROBE, uprobe_default_block)
{
struct sock_filter filter[] = {
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS,
@@ -5048,11 +5107,14 @@ TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_default_block)
ASSERT_EQ(0, run_probed_with_filter(&prog));
}
-TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_block_uretprobe_syscall)
+TEST_F(UPROBE, uprobe_block_syscall)
{
struct sock_filter filter[] = {
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS,
offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)),
+#ifdef __NR_uprobe
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_uprobe, 1, 2),
+#endif
#ifdef __NR_uretprobe
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_uretprobe, 0, 1),
#endif
@@ -5067,11 +5129,14 @@ TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_block_uretprobe_syscall)
ASSERT_EQ(0, run_probed_with_filter(&prog));
}
-TEST_F(URETPROBE, uretprobe_default_block_with_uretprobe_syscall)
+TEST_F(UPROBE, uprobe_default_block_with_syscall)
{
struct sock_filter filter[] = {
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS,
offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)),
+#ifdef __NR_uprobe
+ BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_uprobe, 3, 0),
+#endif
#ifdef __NR_uretprobe
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_uretprobe, 2, 0),
#endif
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists