linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] rust: extend `module!` macro with integer parameter support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72kyAx=wbvYWBTmPb4eppfvGuFsjVMa49nZBrXGbLEDiCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:00:19 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, 
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, 
	Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@...il.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, 
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>, 
	Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	Fiona Behrens <me@...enk.dev>, Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>, 
	linux-modules@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] rust: extend `module!` macro with integer
 parameter support

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 11:26 AM Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> As far as I understand, Miguel would take patch 1-5 for v6.15 and
> modules would take patch 6-7 for v6.16. At least that is my
> understanding from [1], @Petr and @Miguel please correct me if I am
> wrong.

So I offered that as an option -- I assume it is OK since nobody said
anything (please correct me if I am wrong), and it would help get
things moving.

So I will take 1-5 later today or tomorrow unless someone shouts.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel