[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67dd9c7d.c80a0220.2d0437.7969@mx.google.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 10:06:03 -0700
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Antonio Hickey <contact@...e-forge.io>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Antonio Hickey <contact@...oniohickey.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/16] rust: kunit: refactor to use `&raw [const|mut]`
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:28:06AM +0800, David Gow wrote:
[...]
> > Anyway, KUnit `#[test]`s are in -- I was not planning to merge this
> > now anyway, it should be reviewed a bit more.
>
I agree this whole series should wait a bit, but do we want to merge
patch #1 as early as possible (maybe right after v6.15-rc1), so that new
code can switch to &raw since that's the direction anyway?
Regards,
Boqun
> Excellent! I'll make sure to review the new version of the patch when
> it's rebased.
>
> Cheers,
> -- David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists