[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72ngWXcPnn60JFzqfY7pd+1UFmt+CAmg1q67VxfUnuiJfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 20:04:50 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Antonio Hickey <contact@...e-forge.io>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Antonio Hickey <contact@...oniohickey.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/16] rust: kunit: refactor to use `&raw [const|mut]`
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 6:06 PM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I agree this whole series should wait a bit, but do we want to merge
> patch #1 as early as possible (maybe right after v6.15-rc1), so that new
> code can switch to &raw since that's the direction anyway?
Sounds like a good idea to me.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists