linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] Clavis LSM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHC9VhT0y5AO0Yjy649PbsYnN+Xf3_pTJCegW1kPW7=GM9RypQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 18:13:34 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, 
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, 
	"open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM" <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, 
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, 
	"herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, 
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, 
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>, Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>, 
	"casey@...aufler-ca.com" <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	"ebiggers@...nel.org" <ebiggers@...nel.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, 
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"keyrings@...r.kernel.org" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] Clavis LSM

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 5:21 PM Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 21, 2025, at 12:57 PM, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> ...
> > , but I will note that I don't recall you offering to step
> > up and maintain Lockdown anywhere in this thread.
>
> I didn't realize that trying to contribute a new LSM and being willing to
> be the maintainer of it also involved stepping up to maintain lockdown.

It doesn't, but your criticism of how Lockdown is being handled
definitely falls a bit flat.

-- 
paul-moore.com