[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHS8izNfyfVhMj0wBvP0qa=7E4xL+eo9wn_Fi4o2PT8piwACWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:15:14 -0700
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>,
Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, sdf@...ichev.me, asml.silence@...il.com, dw@...idwei.uk,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Victor Nogueira <victor@...atatu.com>,
Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>, Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@...gle.com>,
Kaiyuan Zhang <kaiyuanz@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 4/9] net: devmem: Implement TX path
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 1:53 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Adding Kuniyuki.
>
> On 3/8/25 10:40 PM, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > @@ -931,10 +932,67 @@ int netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > -/* stub */
> > int netdev_nl_bind_tx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> > {
> > - return 0;
> > + struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding;
> > + struct list_head *sock_binding_list;
> > + struct net_device *netdev;
> > + u32 ifindex, dmabuf_fd;
> > + struct sk_buff *rsp;
> > + int err = 0;
> > + void *hdr;
> > +
> > + if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_DEV_IFINDEX) ||
> > + GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_DMABUF_FD))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + ifindex = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_DEV_IFINDEX]);
> > + dmabuf_fd = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_DMABUF_FD]);
> > +
> > + sock_binding_list = genl_sk_priv_get(&netdev_nl_family,
> > + NETLINK_CB(skb).sk);
> > + if (IS_ERR(sock_binding_list))
> > + return PTR_ERR(sock_binding_list);
> > +
> > + rsp = genlmsg_new(GENLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!rsp)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + hdr = genlmsg_iput(rsp, info);
> > + if (!hdr) {
> > + err = -EMSGSIZE;
> > + goto err_genlmsg_free;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rtnl_lock();
>
> The above could possibly be a rtnl_net_lock(), right?
>
> (not strictily related to this series) The same for the existing
> rtnl_lock() call in netdev-genl.c, right?
>
Actually I think this can follow the example set in commit
1d22d3060b9b ("net: drop rtnl_lock for queue_mgmt operations") and
take the netdev_get_by_index_lock().
--
Thanks,
Mina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists