[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z90XZqJVwuWkarnX@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 08:38:14 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, "terrelln@...com" <terrelln@...com>,
"dsterba@...e.com" <dsterba@...e.com>,
"brgerst@...il.com" <brgerst@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Compile problems w/gcc 9.4.0 in linux-next
* Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com> wrote:
> > What are your thoughts as maintainers of lib/zstd?
>
> FYI, the same segfault occurs with gcc 10.5. The problem is fixed
> in gcc 11.4.
So the patch below would work this around on GCC9 and GCC10?
Thanks,
Ingo
==============>
lib/zstd/common/portability_macros.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/zstd/common/portability_macros.h b/lib/zstd/common/portability_macros.h
index 0e3b2c0a527d..0dde8bf56595 100644
--- a/lib/zstd/common/portability_macros.h
+++ b/lib/zstd/common/portability_macros.h
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
#ifndef DYNAMIC_BMI2
#if ((defined(__clang__) && __has_attribute(__target__)) \
|| (defined(__GNUC__) \
- && (__GNUC__ >= 5 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 8)))) \
+ && (__GNUC__ >= 11))) \
&& (defined(__x86_64__) || defined(_M_X64)) \
&& !defined(__BMI2__)
# define DYNAMIC_BMI2 1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists