[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d824f621-bae1-4b79-a4c6-620aeecc1bb0@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:51:03 +0800
From: Wang Liang <wangliang74@...wei.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
CC: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<fw@...len.de>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
<zhangchangzhong@...wei.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: fix NULL pointer dereference in l3mdev_l3_rcv
在 2025/3/20 21:37, Simon Horman 写道:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:07:03AM +0800, Wang Liang wrote:
>> 在 2025/3/18 23:02, David Ahern 写道:
>>> On 3/18/25 3:38 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 09:27:13AM +0800, Wang Liang wrote:
>>>>> When delete l3s ipvlan:
>>>>>
>>>>> ip link del link eth0 ipvlan1 type ipvlan mode l3s
>>>>>
>>>>> This may cause a null pointer dereference:
>>>>>
>>>>> Call trace:
>>>>> ip_rcv_finish+0x48/0xd0
>>>>> ip_rcv+0x5c/0x100
>>>>> __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x64/0xb0
>>>>> __netif_receive_skb+0x20/0x80
>>>>> process_backlog+0xb4/0x204
>>>>> napi_poll+0xe8/0x294
>>>>> net_rx_action+0xd8/0x22c
>>>>> __do_softirq+0x12c/0x354
>>>>>
>>>>> This is because l3mdev_l3_rcv() visit dev->l3mdev_ops after
>>>>> ipvlan_l3s_unregister() assign the dev->l3mdev_ops to NULL. The process
>>>>> like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> (CPU1) | (CPU2)
>>>>> l3mdev_l3_rcv() |
>>>>> check dev->priv_flags: |
>>>>> master = skb->dev; |
>>>>> |
>>>>> | ipvlan_l3s_unregister()
>>>>> | set dev->priv_flags
>>>>> | dev->l3mdev_ops = NULL;
>>>>> |
>>>>> visit master->l3mdev_ops |
>>>>>
>>>>> Add lock for dev->priv_flags and dev->l3mdev_ops is too expensive. Resolve
>>>>> this issue by add check for master->l3mdev_ops.
>>>> Hi Wang Liang,
>>>>
>>>> It seems to me that checking master->l3mdev_ops like this is racy.
>>> vrf device leaves the l3mdev ops set; that is probably the better way to go.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Only l3s ipvlan set the dev->l3mdev_ops to NULL at present, I will delete
>> 'dev->l3mdev_ops = NULL' in ipvlan_l3s_unregister(), is that ok?
> TBH, I am somewhat unclear on the correct tear down behaviour.
> But I also understood that to be David's suggestion.
> And I think that implementing that, and posting it as v2 would
> be a good next step.
Ok. I will send a patch v2 later, please check it.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists