[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9ac99e2-1933-420f-81e3-c3a2946b99fb@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 10:27:06 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, peda@...ntia.se, broonie@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org
Cc: ivprusov@...utedevices.com, luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com,
zhoubinbin@...ngson.cn, paulha@...nsource.cirrus.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
robh@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
johan+linaro@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mux: gpio: add optional regulator support
On 20/03/2025 12:56, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org wrote:
> struct mux_gpio {
> struct gpio_descs *gpios;
> @@ -82,6 +83,13 @@ static int mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> mux_chip->mux->idle_state = idle_state;
> }
>
> + ret = devm_regulator_get_enable_optional(dev, "mux");
> + if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) {
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't retrieve/enable gpio mux supply\n");
return dev_err_probe
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists