lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025032115-gloomily-cubbyhole-dd8e@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 06:04:38 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	giometti@...eenne.com, raymond.tan@...el.com,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] mfd: intel_ehl_pse_gpio: Introduce Intel Elkhart
 Lake PSE GPIO and TIO

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 07:28:22AM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 01:57:35PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Mar 2025, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 12:44:50PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 07 Mar 2025, Raag Jadav wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > > +static void ehl_pse_gpio_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	mfd_remove_devices(&pdev->dev);
> > > > > +	pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> > > > > +}
> > > 
> > > Same here.
> > 
> > Also, Greg has been quite vocal about converting PCI devices to Platform
> > ones in the past.  We may wish to run this past him before continuing.
> 
> Greg, any objections on moving forward with platform device?

I have no context here at all, why would a PCI device EVER be a platform
device?  That feels wrong on so many levels...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ