[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <rjfccsym3sziidac5l4ecxsjy3rdulbf5ewhfksdqp35oxcimi@brvgpgme5wpf>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:07:37 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: Ling Xu <quic_lxu5@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, amahesh@....qualcomm.com, arnd@...db.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, quic_kuiw@...cinc.com,
quic_ekangupt@...cinc.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] misc: fastrpc: add support for gpdsp remoteproc
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 12:23:15PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>
> On 20/03/2025 18:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 05:11:20PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 20/03/2025 09:14, Ling Xu wrote:
> > > > The fastrpc driver has support for 5 types of remoteprocs. There are
> > > > some products which support GPDSP remoteprocs. Add changes to support
> > > > GPDSP remoteprocs.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ling Xu <quic_lxu5@...cinc.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> > > > index 7b7a22c91fe4..80aa554b3042 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> > > > @@ -28,7 +28,9 @@
> > > > #define SDSP_DOMAIN_ID (2)
> > > > #define CDSP_DOMAIN_ID (3)
> > > > #define CDSP1_DOMAIN_ID (4)
> > > > -#define FASTRPC_DEV_MAX 5 /* adsp, mdsp, slpi, cdsp, cdsp1 */
> > > > +#define GDSP0_DOMAIN_ID (5)
> > > > +#define GDSP1_DOMAIN_ID (6)
> > >
> > > We have already made the driver look silly here, Lets not add domain ids for
> > > each instance, which is not a scalable.
> > >
> > > Domain ids are strictly for a domain not each instance.
> >
> > Then CDSP1 should also be gone, correct?
> Its already gone as part of the patch that I shared in this discussion.
>
> I will send a proper patch to list once Ling/Ekansh has agree with it.
I see. For some reason mobile gmail decided that your patch is a quoted
message and ignored it.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists