[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z91zH6iXaJiNCxHg@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:09:35 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] tracing: Mark binary printing functions with
__printf() attribute
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:04:24PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Binary printing functions are using printf() type of format, and compiler
> is not happy about them as is:
>
> kernel/trace/trace.c:3292:9: error: function ‘trace_vbprintk’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Werror=suggest-attribute=format]
> kernel/trace/trace_seq.c:182:9: error: function ‘trace_seq_bprintf’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Werror=suggest-attribute=format]
>
> Fix the compilation errors by adding __printf() attribute.
>
> While at it, move existing __printf() attributes from the implementations
> to the declarations.
This also missed removal of one new line and __printf() in the C file.
Will be improved in v2.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists