linux-kernel - [PATCH v4] lockdep: Fix wait context check on softirq for PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250321143322.79651-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 07:33:22 -0700
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clrkwllms@...nel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@...il.com>,
	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v4] lockdep: Fix wait context check on softirq for PREEMPT_RT

Since commit 0c1d7a2c2d32 ("lockdep: Remove softirq accounting on
PREEMPT_RT."), the wait context test for mutex usage within
"in softirq context" fails as it references @softirq_context.

[    0.184549]   | wait context tests |
[    0.184549]   --------------------------------------------------------------------------
[    0.184549]                                  | rcu  | raw  | spin |mutex |
[    0.184549]   --------------------------------------------------------------------------
[    0.184550]                in hardirq context:  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |
[    0.185083] in hardirq context (not threaded):  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |
[    0.185606]                in softirq context:  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |FAILED|

As a fix, add lockdep map for BH disabled section. This fixes the
issue by letting us catch cases when local_bh_disable() gets called
with preemption disabled where local_lock doesn't get acquired.
In the case of "in softirq context" selftest, local_bh_disable() was
being called with preemption disable as it's early in the boot.

[boqun: Move the lockdep annotations into __local_bh_*() to avoid false
positives because of unpaired local_bh_disable() reported by Borislav
Petkov [1] and Peter Zijlstra [2], and make bh_lock_map only exist for
PREEMPT_RT]

Signed-off-by: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250306122413.GBZ8mT7Z61Tmgnh5Y9@fat_crate.local/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250307113955.GK16878@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/ [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250118054900.18639-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com
---
v3 -> v4:

*	Move the dummy lockdep_map (for detection) to PREEMPT_RT only.

v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250118054900.18639-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com

I would need a tag from RT to send it for v6.16, please take a look,
thanks!

 kernel/softirq.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 4dae6ac2e83f..3ce136bdcbfe 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -126,6 +126,18 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct softirq_ctrl, softirq_ctrl) = {
 	.lock	= INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(softirq_ctrl.lock),
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+static struct lock_class_key bh_lock_key;
+struct lockdep_map bh_lock_map = {
+	.name = "local_bh",
+	.key = &bh_lock_key,
+	.wait_type_outer = LD_WAIT_FREE,
+	.wait_type_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* PREEMPT_RT makes BH preemptible. */
+	.lock_type = LD_LOCK_PERCPU,
+};
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bh_lock_map);
+#endif
+
 /**
  * local_bh_blocked() - Check for idle whether BH processing is blocked
  *
@@ -148,6 +160,8 @@ void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_hardirq());
 
+	lock_map_acquire_read(&bh_lock_map);
+
 	/* First entry of a task into a BH disabled section? */
 	if (!current->softirq_disable_cnt) {
 		if (preemptible()) {
@@ -211,6 +225,8 @@ void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_hardirq());
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
 
+	lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map);
+
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	curcnt = __this_cpu_read(softirq_ctrl.cnt);
 
@@ -261,6 +277,8 @@ static inline void ksoftirqd_run_begin(void)
 /* Counterpart to ksoftirqd_run_begin() */
 static inline void ksoftirqd_run_end(void)
 {
+	/* pairs with the lock_map_acquire_read() in ksoftirqd_run_begin() */
+	lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map);
 	__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET, true);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt());
 	local_irq_enable();
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)