linux-kernel - Re: [RFC Patch v1 0/3] Fix using wrong GPF DVSEC location issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250321021441.vdmo5txhvb6kya3a@offworld>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:14:41 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Li Ming <ming.li@...omail.com>
Cc: jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
	alison.schofield@...el.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
	ira.weiny@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
	linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch v1 0/3] Fix using wrong GPF DVSEC location issue

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025, Li Ming wrote:

>But I am not sure if all dports under a same port will have same
>configuration space layout, if yes, that will not be a problem. If I am
>wrong, please let me know, thanks.

Yes, when caching the dvsec was suggested, it was my assumption that the
config space would be the same.

Thanks,
Davidlohr