linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] Clavis LSM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <195bb943458.28a7.85c95baa4474aabc7814e68940a78392@paul-moore.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 22:00:07 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>
CC: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, "open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM" <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>, Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>, <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>, <ebiggers@...nel.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] Clavis LSM

On March 21, 2025 6:56:53 PM Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 21, 2025, at 4:13 PM, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 5:21 PM Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mar 21, 2025, at 12:57 PM, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> , but I will note that I don't recall you offering to step
>>>> up and maintain Lockdown anywhere in this thread.
>>>
>>> I didn't realize that trying to contribute a new LSM and being willing to
>>> be the maintainer of it also involved stepping up to maintain lockdown.
>>
>> It doesn't, but your criticism of how Lockdown is being handled
>> definitely falls a bit flat.
>
> I merely pointed out the inaccuracy of your assertion that people are 
> freeloading
> off it and not contributing anything substantial by providing an example.

In my opinion the example you provided did not demonstrate that at all for 
reasons already mentioned.  As for the issue of freeloading on Lockdown, I 
believe I've already made myself clear on that point.

--
paul-moore.com