[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z98oChgU7Z9wyTw1@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 21:13:46 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] XArray: revert (unintentional?) behavior change
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:17:08PM -0400, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> Partially revert commit 6684aba0780d ("XArray: Add extra debugging check
> to xas_lock and friends"), fixing test failures in check_xa_alloc.
>
> Fixes: 6684aba0780d ("XArray: Add extra debugging check to xas_lock and friends")
This doesn't fix anything. The first failure is:
#6 0x0000555555649979 in XAS_INVALID (xas=xas@...ry=0x7ffff4a003a0)
at ../shared/linux/../../../../include/linux/xarray.h:1434
#7 0x000055555564f545 in check_xas_retry (xa=xa@...ry=0x55555591ba00 <array>)
--Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging--
at ../../../lib/test_xarray.c:131
#8 0x0000555555663869 in xarray_checks () at ../../../lib/test_xarray.c:2221
#9 0x00005555556639ab in xarray_tests () at xarray.c:15
That has nothing to do with xa_destroy(). What on earth are you doing?
Anyway, I'm at LSFMM and it'a Saturday. I shan't be looking at this
until the 27th. There's clearly no urgency since you're the first one
to notice in six months.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists