[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250322045340.18010-6-enjuk@amazon.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 13:52:56 +0900
From: Kohei Enju <enjuk@...zon.com>
To: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, "Andrii
Nakryiko" <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong
Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav
Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa
<jolsa@...nel.org>, Peilin Ye <yepeilin@...gle.com>, Ilya Leoshkevich
<iii@...ux.ibm.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
<kohei.enju@...il.com>, Kohei Enju <enjuk@...zon.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for load-acquire/store-release when register number is invalid
syzbot reported out-of-bounds read in check_atomic_load/store() when the
register number is invalid in this context:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a5964227adc0f904549c
To avoid the issue from now on, let's add tests where the register number
is invalid for load-acquire/store-release.
After discussion with Eduard, I decided to use R15 as invalid register
because the actual slab-out-of-bounds read issue occurs when the register
number is R12 or larger.
Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <enjuk@...zon.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_store_release.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c
index 1babe9ad9b43..77698d5a19e4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c
@@ -189,6 +189,20 @@ __naked void load_acquire_from_sock_pointer(void)
: __clobber_all);
}
+SEC("socket")
+__description("load-acquire with invalid register R15")
+__failure __failure_unpriv __msg("R15 is invalid")
+__naked void load_acquire_with_invalid_reg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ ".8byte %[load_acquire_insn];" // r0 = load_acquire((u64 *)(r15 + 0));
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_insn(load_acquire_insn,
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_LOAD_ACQ, BPF_REG_0, 15 /* invalid reg */, 0))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
#else /* CAN_USE_LOAD_ACQ_STORE_REL */
SEC("socket")
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_store_release.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_store_release.c
index cd6f1e5f378b..c0442d5bb049 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_store_release.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_store_release.c
@@ -257,6 +257,20 @@ __naked void store_release_leak_pointer_to_map(void)
: __clobber_all);
}
+SEC("socket")
+__description("store-release with invalid register R15")
+__failure __failure_unpriv __msg("R15 is invalid")
+__naked void store_release_with_invalid_reg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ ".8byte %[store_release_insn];" // store_release((u64 *)(r15 + 0), r1);
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_insn(store_release_insn,
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_STORE_REL, 15 /* invalid reg */, BPF_REG_1, 0))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
#else
SEC("socket")
--
2.48.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists