[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN2Y7hyM6pAupptUZx-cQsbTimxYSYKinyrSGBLYq5i3Dbxmgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 20:45:51 +0800
From: ying chen <yc1082463@...il.com>
To: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [bug report, 6.1.52] /proc/loadavg shows incorrect values
Hello everyone. Have you ever encountered a similar situation?
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 9:54 PM ying chen <yc1082463@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> In our production environment, "cat /proc/loadavg" shows incorrect
> huge values. The kernel version is 6.1.52. So far, at least four such
> cases have been found. It seems to be a kernel bug.
>
> ~$ cat /proc/loadavg
> 4294967392.49 4294967395.80 4294967395.83 87/16100 2341720
>
> top output is below:
>
> top - 21:12:13 up 191 days, 20:50, 1 user, load average:
> 4294967397.45, 4294967396.82, 4294967396.15
> Tasks: 2388 total, 3 running, 1208 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> %Cpu(s): 27.9 us, 6.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 57.3 id, 0.5 wa, 1.7 hi, 5.8 si, 0.0 st
> KiB Mem : 99966995+total, 56704217+free, 22655678+used, 20607096+buff/cache
> KiB Swap: 0 total, 0 free, 0 used. 68817177+avail Mem
Powered by blists - more mailing lists