linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250324072334.064b83bb@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 07:23:34 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing
 List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Manivannan Sadhasivam
 <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

Hi Bart,

On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 09:29:20 -0700 Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> wrote:
>
> Thank you for having resolved this conflict. While the conflict
> resolution looks good to me and should result in working code, it may
> be desirable to resolve it differently (init_completion() before the
> ufs_get_desired_pm_lvl_for_dev_link_state() calls). This way the
> spin_lock_init() and init_completion() calls stay close to each other.

I have fixed this up from today.  Thanks for checking.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped