[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250323063850.GA30703@lst.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 07:38:51 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, brauner@...nel.org,
djwong@...nel.org, hch@....de, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
dchinner@...hat.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, tytso@....edu,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iomap: rework IOMAP atomic flags
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 01:17:08AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
[full quote deleted, can you please properly trim your replies?]
> So, I guess we can shift IOMAP_F_SIZE_CHANGED and IOMAP_F_STALE by
> 1 bit. So it will all look like..
Let's create some more space to avoid this for the next round, e.g.
count the core set flags from 31 down, and limit IOMAP_F_PRIVATE to a
single flag, which is how it is used.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists