[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <352b3fb3-0acd-44bf-8f69-cf72b5d27e67@web.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 09:30:21 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Bence Csókás <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Christophe Jaillet <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] dma-engine: sun4i: Use devm functions in probe()
> Clean up … and dev_err_probe(). …
I find it more reasonable to offer such a change in a separate update step.
https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.14-rc7#n81
Will it be clearer to mention also the function name “sun4i_dma_probe”
in the summary phrases?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists