[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3437446-798d-f4f3-11d7-675f8886575b@gentwo.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 09:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@...two.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] [DEBUG] slab: Report number of NULLings
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025, Kees Cook wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
> index 2717ad238fa2..a4740c8b6ccb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> @@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ void __kfree(const void *objp);
> void __kfree_sensitive(const void *objp);
> size_t __ksize(const void *objp);
>
> +extern atomic_t count_nulled;
That is a scalability issue. Use a vmstat counter instead?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists