linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] rust: drm: Add GPUVM abstraction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72=aVRMvOaU48DBLL=p+VoG3RvHK+K48XQhvHw3ARc0BNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 20:38:17 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, 
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rust: drm: Add GPUVM abstraction

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 8:25 PM Daniel Almeida
<daniel.almeida@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> By the way, maybe we should have a lint for CamelCase in docs? I tried my best to
> cover all of these, but some slip through :/
>
> i.e.: if you write something in CamelCase somewhere in the docs, there's a high
> chance that you should actually use Markdown and link as appropriate.
>
> I have no idea whether this would actually work in practice, to be honest. It’s just
> a random suggestion (that I'd be willing to help with).

Yeah, I asked upstream if we could have something that at least
detects what could have been intra-doc links, because that should not
have too many false positives since it is a subset:

    https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131510

It is still tricky, because e.g. `Some` or `None` would need to be
excluded, even if you require the exact same case. So it probably
still requires extra heuristics.

Then there is:

    https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#doc_markdown

which is closer to your idea. It has a few false positives (e.g.
KUnit) from a quick try, so probably we cannot enable it for
everything, unless we commit to maintain a list of terms in the
config. It spots a handful of things we should fix, though -- I can
send a few patches or create good first issues.

Cheers,
Miguel