lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <135e8686-1eaf-44d7-a547-1c9611f7f180@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 19:49:50 -0300
From: Filipe Xavier <felipeaggger@...il.com>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
 Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>,
 live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, felipe_life@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests: livepatch: add new ftrace helpers
 functions

On 3/24/25 3:36 PM, Joe Lawrence wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 06:20:35PM -0300, Filipe Xavier wrote:
>> [ ... snip ... ]
>>
>> +	if [[ -n "$FTRACE_FILTER" ]]; then
>> +		echo "$FTRACE_FILTER" \
>> +			| sed -e "/#### all functions enabled ####/d"
>> +			> "$SYSFS_TRACING_DIR/set_ftrace_filter"
>> +	fi
>    
> Also, this may be more stylistic than a functional nit (I don't know for
> sure), but shellcheck [1] seemed confused about these lines:
>
>     In tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/functions.sh line 90:
>                            > "$SYSFS_TRACING_DIR/set_ftrace_filter"
>                            ^-- SC2188 (warning): This redirection doesn't have a command. Move to its command (or use 'true' as no-op).
>
> I wasn't going to comment on these until I saw shellcheck note them, but
> I thought shell script convention was typically to end the line with the
> redirection/pipe then escape the end of line like:
>
>    commands | commands > \
>        tee output.txt
>
> There are a few existing examples of this pattern if you grep the
> functions.sh file for '\\$'.
>
> That said, I'm far from certain whether which order is better than the
> other.  The only reason for bringing it up is that shellcheck warns on
> this patch's usage.
>
> [1] https://www.shellcheck.net/
>
> -- Joe

Thanks for review Joe, I'm sending a new version with all the fixes.

Cheers

Filipe


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ