lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z-ERhIEtrVpTIdJb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 09:02:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/alternatives: remove false sharing in
 poke_int3_handler()


* Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:

> Do you have a specific case in mind that I can test on these big 
> platforms ?

No. I was thinking of large-scale kprobes or ftrace patching - but you 
are right that the text_mutex should naturally serialize all the 
write-side code here.

Mind adding your second round of test results to the changelog as well, 
which improved per call overhead from 36 to 28 nsecs?

Thanks,

	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ