lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4256f8ab-d975-4f5d-8762-50d301ce4dcd@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:33:24 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, peda@...ntia.se,
 broonie@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org
Cc: ivprusov@...utedevices.com, luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com,
 zhoubinbin@...ngson.cn, paulha@...nsource.cirrus.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
 robh@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
 perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com,
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 johan+linaro@...nel.org, Christopher Obbard <christopher.obbard@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] ASoC: dt-bindings: wcd93xx: add bindings for audio
 mux controlling hp



On 24/03/2025 11:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/03/2025 12:06, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org wrote:
>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>>
>> On some platforms to minimise pop and click during switching between
>> CTIA and OMTP headset an additional HiFi mux is used. Most common
>> case is that this switch is switched on by default, but on some
>> platforms this needs a regulator enable.
>>
>> Move to using mux-controls so that both the gpio and regulators can be
>> driven correctly, rather than adding regulator handing in the codec.
>>
>> This patch adds required bindings to add such mux controls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>> Tested-by: Christopher Obbard <christopher.obbard@...aro.org>
> 
> I claim you cannot test a binding in the way we understand Tested-by
> tags. Testing a binding is part of the build process and we do not have
> tested-by for builds...

I see your point, Normally if the tested by is given to series Its 
applied to all the patches in that series, I guess even b4 does that.

Will make a note of this next time and not add tested by to bindings.



Thanks,
Srini

> 
> Anyway,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ