[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250324103313.2bc42730@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:33:13 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux trace kernel
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Masami
Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: next-20250319: arm shmobile_defconfig trace.c undefined type
'struct module'
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 19:42:42 +0530
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 17:01, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Regressions on arm the shmobile_defconfig builds failed with clang-20 and gcc-13
> >
> > First seen on the next-20250312
> > Good: next-20250311
> > Bad: next-20250312 .. next-20250319
> >
> > Regressions found on arm:
> > - gcc-13-shmobile_defconfig
> > - gcc-8-shmobile_defconfig
> > - clang-20-shmobile_defconfig
> >
> > Regression Analysis:
> > - New regression? Yes
> > - Reproducible? Yes
> >
> > Build regression: arm shmobile_defconfig trace.c undefined type 'struct module'
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> Anders bisected this build regression to the following commit,
>
> # first bad commit:
> [dca91c1c54686914dec4dabea8bae4f365c02007]
> tracing: Have persistent trace instances save module addresses
>
> Lore link,
> - https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYs62qxt1PajEp2A8uUmQFeAsC2JBV2wuspbAxz_hFF7CA@mail.gmail.com/
The fix should have been pushed to linux-next already.
Could you test the latest linux-next?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists