[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250324145815.1026314-11-akshay.gupta@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:58:14 +0000
From: Akshay Gupta <akshay.gupta@....com>
To: <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux@...ck-us.net>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<shyam-sundar.s-k@....com>, <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
<mario.limonciello@....com>, <naveenkrishna.chatradhi@....com>,
<anand.umarji@....com>, Akshay Gupta <akshay.gupta@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 10/11] misc: amd-sbi: Add support for register xfer
- Provide user register access over IOCTL.
Both register read and write are supported.
- APML interface does not provide a synchronization method. By defining,
a register access path, we use APML modules and library for
all APML transactions. Without having to use external tools such as
i2c-tools, which may cause race conditions.
Reviewed-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <naveenkrishna.chatradhi@....com>
Signed-off-by: Akshay Gupta <akshay.gupta@....com>
---
Changes since v5:
- Patch rebased
Changes since v4:
- Previously patch 8
- Address review comment for documentation warning
Changes since v3:
- Add ioctl description comment
Changes since v2:
- update the MACROS name as per feedback
Changes since v1:
- bifurcated from previous patch 5
drivers/misc/amd-sbi/rmi-core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/misc/amd-apml.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/amd-sbi/rmi-core.c b/drivers/misc/amd-sbi/rmi-core.c
index 89fa6da453a7..44079bb92c78 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/amd-sbi/rmi-core.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/amd-sbi/rmi-core.c
@@ -349,6 +349,27 @@ int rmi_mailbox_xfer(struct sbrmi_data *data,
return ret;
}
+static int rmi_register_xfer(struct sbrmi_data *data,
+ struct apml_message *msg)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!msg))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ mutex_lock(&data->lock);
+ if (msg->data_in.reg_in[AMD_SBI_RD_FLAG_INDEX])
+ ret = regmap_read(data->regmap,
+ msg->data_in.reg_in[AMD_SBI_REG_OFF_INDEX],
+ &msg->data_out.mb_out[AMD_SBI_RD_WR_DATA_INDEX]);
+ else
+ ret = regmap_write(data->regmap,
+ msg->data_in.reg_in[AMD_SBI_REG_OFF_INDEX],
+ msg->data_in.reg_in[AMD_SBI_REG_VAL_INDEX]);
+ mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static long sbrmi_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
{
struct apml_message msg = { 0 };
@@ -385,6 +406,10 @@ static long sbrmi_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
/* MCAMSR protocol */
ret = rmi_mca_msr_read(data, &msg);
break;
+ case APML_REG:
+ /* REG R/W */
+ ret = rmi_register_xfer(data, &msg);
+ break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
diff --git a/include/uapi/misc/amd-apml.h b/include/uapi/misc/amd-apml.h
index efbdc7276e6b..0d33f6b07947 100644
--- a/include/uapi/misc/amd-apml.h
+++ b/include/uapi/misc/amd-apml.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
enum apml_protocol {
APML_CPUID = 0x1000,
APML_MCA_MSR,
+ APML_REG,
};
/* These are byte indexes into data_in and data_out arrays */
@@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ struct apml_message {
/*
* [0]...[3] mailbox 32bit input
* cpuid & mca msr,
+ * rmi rd/wr: reg_offset
* [4][5] cpuid & mca msr: thread
* [4] rmi reg wr: value
* [6] cpuid: ext function & read eax/ebx or ecx/edx
@@ -53,6 +55,7 @@ struct apml_message {
* Mailbox Messages: 0x0 ... 0x999
* APML_CPUID: 0x1000
* APML_MCA_MSR: 0x1001
+ * APML_REG: 0x1002
*/
__u32 cmd;
/*
@@ -83,6 +86,7 @@ struct apml_message {
* - Mailbox message read/write(0x0~0x999)
* - CPUID read(0x1000)
* - MCAMSR read(0x1001)
+ * - Register read/write(0x1002)
* - returning "-EFAULT" if none of the above
* "-EPROTOTYPE" error is returned to provide additional error details
*/
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists