[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250324162353.72271-1-superman.xpt@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 09:23:53 -0700
From: Penglei Jiang <superman.xpt@...il.com>
To: brauner@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de,
jlayton@...nel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
felix.moessbauer@...mens.com,
adrian.ratiu@...labora.com,
xu.xin16@....com.cn,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+f9238a0a31f9b5603fef@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+02e64be5307d72e9c309@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Penglei Jiang <superman.xpt@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] proc: Fix the issue of proc_mem_open returning NULL
The following functions call proc_mem_open but do not handle the case
where it returns NULL:
__mem_open in fs/proc/base.c
proc_maps_open in fs/proc/task_mmu.c
smaps_rollup_open in fs/proc/task_mmu.c
pagemap_open in fs/proc/task_mmu.c
maps_open in fs/proc/task_nommu.c
The following reported bugs may be related to this issue:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000f52642060d4e3750@google.com
https://lore.kernel.org/all/0000000000001bc4a00612d9a7f4@google.com
Fix:
Modify proc_mem_open to return an error code in case of errors, instead
of returning NULL.
Signed-off-by: Penglei Jiang <superman.xpt@...il.com>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index cd89e956c322..b5e7317cf0dc 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ struct mm_struct *proc_mem_open(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode)
put_task_struct(task);
if (IS_ERR(mm))
- return mm == ERR_PTR(-ESRCH) ? NULL : mm;
+ return mm;
/* ensure this mm_struct can't be freed */
mmgrab(mm);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists