[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40c849f4-aaeb-48fb-87af-dfe9d404fc7d@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:25:39 +0000
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v0.3 4/6] PM: EM: Move CPU capacity check to
em_adjust_new_capacity()
Hi Rafael,
On 3/7/25 19:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Move the check of the CPU capacity currently stored in the energy model
> against the arch_scale_cpu_capacity() value to em_adjust_new_capacity()
> so it will be done regardless of where the latter is called from.
>
> This will be useful when a new em_adjust_new_capacity() caller is added
> subsequently.
>
> While at it, move the pd local variable declaration in
> em_check_capacity_update() into the loop in which it is used.
>
> No intentional functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> kernel/power/energy_model.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> @@ -721,10 +721,24 @@
> * Adjustment of CPU performance values after boot, when all CPUs capacites
> * are correctly calculated.
> */
> -static void em_adjust_new_capacity(struct device *dev,
> +static void em_adjust_new_capacity(unsigned int cpu, struct device *dev,
> struct em_perf_domain *pd)
> {
> + unsigned long cpu_capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
> struct em_perf_table *em_table;
> + struct em_perf_state *table;
> + unsigned long em_max_perf;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + table = em_perf_state_from_pd(pd);
> + em_max_perf = table[pd->nr_perf_states - 1].performance;
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + if (em_max_perf == cpu_capacity)
> + return;
> +
> + pr_debug("updating cpu%d cpu_cap=%lu old capacity=%lu\n", cpu,
> + cpu_capacity, em_max_perf);
>
> em_table = em_table_dup(pd);
> if (!em_table) {
> @@ -740,9 +754,6 @@
> static void em_check_capacity_update(void)
> {
> cpumask_var_t cpu_done_mask;
> - struct em_perf_state *table;
> - struct em_perf_domain *pd;
> - unsigned long cpu_capacity;
> int cpu;
>
> if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_done_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> @@ -753,7 +764,7 @@
> /* Check if CPUs capacity has changed than update EM */
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> - unsigned long em_max_perf;
> + struct em_perf_domain *pd;
> struct device *dev;
>
> if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_done_mask))
> @@ -776,24 +787,7 @@
> cpumask_or(cpu_done_mask, cpu_done_mask,
> em_span_cpus(pd));
>
> - cpu_capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
> -
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - table = em_perf_state_from_pd(pd);
> - em_max_perf = table[pd->nr_perf_states - 1].performance;
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> -
> - /*
> - * Check if the CPU capacity has been adjusted during boot
> - * and trigger the update for new performance values.
> - */
> - if (em_max_perf == cpu_capacity)
> - continue;
> -
> - pr_debug("updating cpu%d cpu_cap=%lu old capacity=%lu\n",
> - cpu, cpu_capacity, em_max_perf);
> -
> - em_adjust_new_capacity(dev, pd);
> + em_adjust_new_capacity(cpu, dev, pd);
> }
>
> free_cpumask_var(cpu_done_mask);
>
>
>
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Regards,
Lukasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists