[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f9ea3e3-e348-46d7-9b15-8c017762b12f@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 01:39:25 +0900
From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin
<tursulin@...ulin.net>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] bits: Split asm and non-asm GENMASK*() and unify
definitions
On 25/03/2025 at 01:11, Yury Norov wrote:
> + Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>
> This series moves GENMASK_U128 out of uapi. ARM is the only proposed
> user. Add ARM people for visibility.
Actually, not yet. Here, I am decoupling GENMASK_U128() from
__GENMASK_U128(), but I did not touch the uapi.
After this series, __GENMASK_U128() is not used anymore in the kernel,
but I am not brave enough to remove it myself because there is always a
risk that some userland code somewhere is relying on it…
(...)
Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol
Powered by blists - more mailing lists