[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250325091335.6833ed27@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 09:13:35 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
decui@...rosoft.com, stephen@...workplumber.org, kys@...rosoft.com,
paulros@...rosoft.com, olaf@...fle.de, vkuznets@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, wei.liu@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, leon@...nel.org, longli@...rosoft.com,
ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
ast@...nel.org, hawk@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
shradhagupta@...ux.microsoft.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mana: Switch to page pool for jumbo frames
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 18:04:35 -0700 Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> Since commit 8218f62c9c9b ("mm: page_frag: use initial zero offset for
> page_frag_alloc_align()"), the netdev_alloc_frag() no longer works for
> fragsz > PAGE_SIZE. And, this behavior is by design.
This is inaccurate, AFAIU. The user of frag allocator with fragsz >
PAGE_SIZE has _always_ been incorrect. It's just that it fails in
a more obvious way now? Please correct the commit message.
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists