[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAWPR04MB9910FE139C88507DE5904ABD9CA72@PAWPR04MB9910.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:43:33 +0000
From: Jeff Chen <jeff.chen_1@....com>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
CC: "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"briannorris@...omium.org" <briannorris@...omium.org>,
"johannes@...solutions.net" <johannes@...solutions.net>, Pete Hsieh
<tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>, "s.hauer@...gutronix.de"
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] wifi: mwifiex: Fix premature release of
RF calibration data.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2025 12:29 AM
> To: Jeff Chen <jeff.chen_1@....com>
> Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> briannorris@...omium.org; johannes@...solutions.net; francesco@...cini.it;
> Pete Hsieh <tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>; s.hauer@...gutronix.de
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] wifi: mwifiex: Fix premature release of RF
> calibration data.
>
>
> Hello Jeff,
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 01:07:38PM +0800, Jeff Chen wrote:
> > This patch resolves an issue where RF calibration data was being
> > released before the download process. Without this fix, the external
> > calibration data file would not be downloaded at all.
> >
> > Fixes: d39fbc88956e ("mwifiex: remove cfg_data construction")
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Chen <jeff.chen_1@....com>
>
> The code looks ok to me, however I do not understand the commit you
> selected as fixes tag.
>
> From what I understand releasing the data before using it was done since the
> initial commit 388ec385d5ce ("mwifiex: add calibration data download
> feature"). What am I missing?
>
> Francesco
Hello Francesco,
Thank you for reviewing the patch. You are correct-the Fixes tag I included was incorrect.
After re-examining the issue, I found that the premature release of RF calibration data
cannot be reproduced, which invalidates the problem statement for this patch.
I have decided to withdraw the patch. I appreciate your feedback and attention to detail,
which helped identify this oversight.
Best regards,
Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists